Six Key Lessons Industry Leaders Have Learned: What Works, What Doesn’t 

Reflecting on 30 years of senior living evolution, a panel of veteran investors, developers, and operators shared their most valuable lessons learned to guide future decision making as the industry enters what could be a super-cycle of growth. The lively panel discussion took place at the 2025 NIC Fall Conference and drew a packed audience.

“We’re presenting six lessons learned of both the successes and the failures, so hopefully we can all be wiser in the next growth cycle,” said NIC Co-Founder and Strategic Advisor Bob Kramer, who moderated the session.

Kramer set the discussion in context by noting that today’s market conditions—high consumer demand, compelling demographics and historically low levels of new supply—echo earlier boom times.

Here are the six lessons learned from the leaders who’ve already experienced the industry’s highs and lows.

1- Develop your business model around the customer you plan to serve.

While that sounds simple, it’s more complicated than that, according to panelist Kurt Read of RSF Partners. He identifies three elements necessary to increase the probability of success. First is a laser-like focus on a particular type of customer.  Secondly, build a culture and operating model to serve that customer. Lastly, create an environment with a cost structure and margin of safety that supports scalable growth. 

Panelist Leigh Ann Barney of Trilogy Health Services said the company’s core operating principle is to create a hospitality type experience in a healthcare setting. Trilogy also offers a continuum of care and stays focused on properties in the Midwest. Lesson learned: Stick to what you’re good at.

2- Define your North Star.

“Engineer your business with the end in mind,” said John Rijos of Chicago Pacific Founders and CPF Living Communities. Too often, companies jump into senior living without a clear plan or vision of what kind of communities they want to own.

For Steven Vick of Signature Senior Living, his North Star is understanding his customer: a frail resident in need of assisted living or skilled care at a price point below that of the cost of a private room in a nursing home. That formula works for Signature which focuses on middle-market communities in Northeast Texas. Vick learned an important lesson when he worked at Alterra Healthcare during its go-go days in the late 1990s, opening a building every 32 hours. “Don’t do that,” he said.

3- Make sure your capital partner understands and supports your business model. 

Customer strategy must inform capital, not vice versa. Stephanie Harris of Arrow Senior Living entered the industry as a turnaround consultant in 1999 to help clean up some of the casualties of the overbuilding during that era. “It allowed me to think about what kind of capital partner I would want to work with,” she said. Harris eventually rebranded her business as Arrow Senior Living, managing 39 properties. “We found the right capital partner. We’re very fortunate,” she said. “We worked on getting it right from the very beginning.”

4- Avoid being overleveraged. Prepare for the unexpected.

“Being overleveraged is your Achilles’ heel,” warned Rijos. During the pandemic, he recalled that some developers built communities with only 15% equity and 85% debt. “That’s a disaster,” said Rijos. “Things will go wrong. There will be downturns.” He added that if you can’t put at least 35-40% of equity into the community then you shouldn’t do the deal.

During his time at Alterra, Vick also learned that debt is not your friend. “Be the owner of ‘no,’” he said. Signature has been successful because Vick has been able to say ‘no’ to extras, like swimming pools, that don’t support the frail customer at a middle-market price point. 

5- Maintain focus.  Understand the relationship between operational complexity and growth.

Trilogy offers a continuum of care. “Our business is very complex because of all the service lines we offer,” said Barney. “That’s why we’ve stayed focused in geographic areas that we know.”  This clustering strategy has helped Trilogy grow to 130 campuses in five states. 

6- Build an organizational culture and trust in your team.

“Always solve your people-problems first,” said Rijos. “Then a lot of the other problems will take care of themselves.”  Build trust in the organization. For example, give the executive director the ability to try a new approach without a penalty if it fails. He prefers flat organizational structures rather than those with multiple management layers.

Trilogy invests in its workforce with a robust apprenticeship program for every hourly position. “It’s not just wages or benefits, but how we invest in their retention,” said Barney. “We’ve chosen to do that through education and growth opportunities. Our employees drive our engine.”

Kramer wrapped up the session by encouraging attendees to create successful operating models and investment structures as the industry evolves over the next 30 years. “Take these six lessons learned back to your team and put them into practice,” he said.

Watch a replay of the full NIC Fall Conference session here: Understanding the Past of Senior Housing and Long-Term Care to Prepare for Our Future.

CCRC Performance 3Q 2025: Five-Year Trends in CCRC Entrance Fees

The following analysis examines broader occupancy trends, year-over-year changes in inventory, and same-store asking rent growth – by care segment – within 1,049 entrance fee and rental CCRCs in the 99 NIC MAP Primary and Secondary Markets.

3Q 2025 Market Fundamentals by Care Segment – Entrance Fee vs. Rental CCRCs

The exhibit below compares the market performance of entrance fee CCRCs and rental CCRCs by care segment for the third quarter of 2025, highlighting year-over-year (YOY) changes in occupancy, inventory, and asking rent growth.

Occupancy. Entrance fee CCRCs continued to report higher occupancy rates than rental CCRCs across all care segments. Among entrance fee CCRCs, the independent living segment achieved the highest occupancy at 93.6%. Similarly, within rental CCRCs, independent living reported the strongest performance with a 91.8% occupancy rate.

The difference in occupancy rates between entrance fee CCRCs and rental CCRCs was largest in the independent living segment (1.8pps), followed by nursing care (1.7pps) and assisted living (0.9pps), with the smallest gap seen in the memory care segment (0.1pps).

Rental CCRCs recorded the higher YOY occupancy growth in independent living (2.4pps), assisted living (2.1pps), and memory care (2.1pps) segments. While entrance fee CCRCs showed higher YOY occupancy growth in the nursing care (2.4pps) segment.

Asking Rent. The average monthly asking rent for entrance fee CCRCs remained higher than that of rental CCRCs across all care segments. Rental CCRCs showed higher YOY rent growth in assisted living (4.4% to $6,459) and memory care (4.3% to $8,238) segments. Entrance fee CCRCs experienced stronger YOY rent growth in independent living (4.5% to $4,325) and nursing care (4.9% to $479*) segments.

Note, these figures represent asking rates and do not reflect any discounts that may be applied. The nursing care average daily rent is the average private pay per diem rate.

Inventory. Compared to the level a year ago, rental CCRCs experienced inventory decline across all care segments except for memory care, which showed a modest gain (0.9%). The largest decline was observed in the assisted living segment (-2.0%), followed by nursing care (-1.5%) and independent living (-0.7%) segments.

In contrast, entrance fee CCRCs displayed a mixed trend: assisted living recorded the largest YOY inventory increase (0.7%), the nursing care segment experienced the largest decline (-0.9%), while independent living segment inventory remained unchanged from the prior year.

Negative inventory growth can occur when units or beds are temporarily or permanently taken offline or converted to another care segment, offsetting any newly added supply.

Steady Increases in CCRC Entrance Fees

The exhibit below explores the average entrance fees and YOY entrance fee growth across 99 NIC MAP primary and secondary markets from 2020 through 2025. The bar chart illustrates the average entrance fee in dollar amounts, while the line graph depicts the YOY entrance fee growth rate.

The average entrance fees in CCRCs have risen steadily over the past five years. In 2020, the average entrance fee was approximately $400,000, increasing to about $430,000 by 2022 and surpassing $480,000 by 2025. Overall, the average entrance fee in CCRCs has increased by $88,386 during this five-year period, representing a cumulative growth of 22.3%. As background, over the same five-year period, the median sales price of houses sold in the United States has risen cumulatively by 29.5%, according to data from FRED. This reflects continued demand for entrance fee-based CCRCs, as the cost to enter these communities gradually climbed year after year.

The YOY entrance fee growth rate in CCRCs fluctuated during the period. The orange line in the exhibit above highlights annual percentage growth rates, with the growth rate peaking at 6.3% in 2022, indicating a notable jump in costs that year. This was followed by a moderation in growth, with rates easing to 3.5% in 2023, rising slightly to 4.3% in 2024, and maintaining the growth at 4.3% in 2025. These changes suggest that the pace of growth has varied, potentially influenced by market dynamics, consumer demand, and broader economic conditions.

Look for future articles from NIC to delve into the performance of CCRCs.

Senior Housing Posts Highest NCREIF Property Type Return in Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2025

Senior housing posted a positive total return of 2.88% in the third quarter of 2025, bringing year-to-date returns to 7.00%, the highest NCREIF property type return for both the third quarter and year-to-date performance. Senior housing in the third quarter outperformed the broader Expanded NCREIF Property Index (NPI) by 166 basis points, with the index posting a total return of 1.22%. Senior housing capital appreciation in the third quarter was positive with valuations increasing 1.50%. The capital appreciation return is the change in value net of any capital expenditures incurred during the quarter. Senior housing income return in the third quarter was also positive, yielding 1.38%. For the broader NPI in the third quarter, both capital appreciation (+0.06%) and income yield (+1.16%) were lower than senior housing but still positive.

By senior housing property subtype, independent living (+3.11%) outperformed assisted living (+2.66%) in the third quarter. In recent years, independent living has also outperformed assisted living over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. This outperformance may be driven by higher margins typically generated in lower acuity settings such as independent living, which require less staffing and labor expenses than higher acuity settings such as assisted living. Additionally, independent living has had higher occupancy rates over the five-year period, which surpassed 90% in the third quarter. Over the longer run, since NCREIF began tracking returns data for these subtypes roughly a decade ago, both assisted living and independent living posted similar average returns of more than 5.7% annually.

Annualized Total Returns by NCREIF Property Subtype
As of 9/30/2025; Unlevered

Annualized Total Returns Chart

Note: Since Inception is 2014 for Assisted Living and 2016 for Independent Living
Source: NCREIF, 3Q 2025, Unlevered Annualized Total Returns

Compared to other NCREIF property types over the one-year period, senior housing was also the strongest performer, returning 9.21% and outperforming the NPI by nearly 450 basis points. Over the 10-, 15-, and 20-year periods, senior housing was the third strongest property type behind industrial and self-storage, outperforming the NPI on an annualized basis by 66, 68, and 262 basis points, respectively. Since the 2003 inception of NCREIF’s senior housing historical series, income yield drove roughly 60% of senior housing total returns, while price appreciation contributed roughly 40%. These performance measures reflect the returns of 213 senior housing properties valued at $12.68 billion in the third quarter. Overall, the number of senior housing properties tracked within the NPI has grown significantly from the 56 properties initially tracked in 2003.

Annualized Total Returns by NCREIF Property Type

As of 9/30/2025; Unlevered

Annualized Total Returns by NCREIF Property Type

Source: NCREIF, 3Q 2025, Unlevered Annualized Total Returns

Senior Housing Total Returns by Income Yield versus Price Appreciation

As of 9/30/2025; Unlevered

Senior Housing Total Returns by Income Yield vs Price Appreciation

Source: NCREIF, 3Q 2025, Unlevered Annualized Total Returns

Senior housing occupancy rates in the third quarter continued climbing, with independent living surpassing 90% occupancy and assisted living jumping nearly one full percentage point to more than 87% occupied. Occupied senior housing units reached another record high, while year-over-year inventory growth fell to new record lows since NIC MAP began tracking this data in 2006. New supply is expected to remain moderate in the near term as the number of units under construction has fallen to levels last seen in 2012. Looking ahead, as a result of these robust market fundamentals, occupancy rates are on track to reach new record highs in 2026.

TOTAL RETURN
NCREIF Property Index (NPI) Senior Housing Assisted Living Independent Living
3Q 20251.222.882.663.11
YTD3.767.006.028.04
One Year4.729.217.6210.99
Three Years-2.312.200.634.07
Five Years3.922.831.554.37
Ten Years5.125.785.20N/A
Fifteen Years7.588.26N/AN/A
Twenty Years6.629.24N/AN/A
INCOME
NCREIF Property Index (NPI) Senior Housing Assisted Living Independent Living
3Q 20251.161.381.431.34
YTD3.574.144.214.10
One Year4.785.505.565.47
Three Years4.544.654.305.10
Five Years4.384.153.734.67
Ten Years4.504.804.62N/A
Fifteen Years4.905.46N/AN/A
Twenty Years5.175.91N/AN/A
APPRECIATION
NCREIF Property Index (NPI) Senior Housing Assisted Living Independent Living
3Q 20250.061.501.231.77
YTD0.192.781.763.84
One Year0.063.561.985.30
Three Years-6.62-2.37-3.55-0.99
Five Years-0.45-1.27-2.12-0.29
Ten Years0.600.950.57N/A
Fifteen Years2.592.70N/AN/A
Twenty Years1.393.20N/AN/A

Source: NCREIF, 3Q 2025, Unlevered Annualized Total Returns

Value-Based Care Update for Senior Housing & Care

Telehealth Updates. Telehealth has been an important flexibility enabling many senior living residents and communities to maintain better access to healthcare as well as reducing transportation and travel costs. Some senior housing residents have seen reduced telehealth access since broad waivers expired on September 30, 2025. This may require rescheduling visits to in-person until a federal budget is reached. It is important to note that telehealth coverage remains for residents who receive care under an Accountable Care Organization (ACO), for those receiving mental health services, for visits under commercial plans (including Medicare Advantage plans), and residents in nursing homes located in eligible rural or underserved areas. For further details, please review the CMS Telehealth website. To learn more about rural or underserved status, please see the Medicare Telehealth Eligibility Analyzer.

Medicare Advantage in 2026. During the Medicare Advantage annual open enrollment, running from October 15th to December 7th, senior housing residents can switch plans or adjust existing coverage. Overall, plans are expected to have stable costs even as the total number of plans available has been reduced. As open enrollment occurs, senior housing leaders considering how to support residents in navigating plan options can ensure they access benefits that are changing, like chronic care management, wellness programs, and in-home support, all of which can enhance resident satisfaction and improve health outcomes. Additionally, assessing marketplace updates and resident election changes can inform and better support healthcare referrals and extend resident stays. To explore 2026 Medicare Advantage Plan options, review the Plan Compare website.

Recent VBC Connections and Events. Strategic insights from leading organizations, innovators and teams were featured at both the 2nd Annual VBC Workshop in Atlanta, Georgia, and the Annual National Association of Accountable Care Organizations (NAACOS) Fall Conference in Washington, DC. Senior housing leaders, innovators, and ACO partners remain at the forefront of some of the most successful collaborations accomplishing the quadruple aim, building the future and bringing care home for seniors. Look out for new case studies and insights coming soon from NIC to advance planning, action and innovation. Also, if you have not yet accessed NIC’s newly updated web page devoted to these important topics, we encourage readers to visit NIC’s Healthcare and Wellness webpage to find podcasts and other important resources aimed at advancing the connections between senior housing and healthcare.

Upcoming Opportunities. Register now for an upcoming NIC webinar, Partnering with ACOs: Understanding the Business Case for Value-Based Care in Senior Housing. Speakers from Presbyterian Homes, LCS, and NIC will cover action steps and tools for senior housing leaders to gain insight, calculate value, and operationalize strategies to maximize partnerships with ACOs and MA plans. 

Independent Living Occupancy Rate Tops 90% in 3Q While Inventory Growth Sets Record Low

The NIC Analytics team presented findings during a webinar with NIC MAP clients on October 9th, sharing key senior housing data trends during the third quarter of 2025. Additionally, Tom Grape, Founder, Chairman & CEO at Benchmark Senior Living and Andy Kohlberg, President & CEO at Kisco Senior Living joined Lisa McCracken, Head of Research & Analytics at NIC, for a CEO panel discussion on recent trends.

Key takeaways included the following: 

Takeaway #1: Independent Living Occupancy Rate Climbs Above 90%

  • The occupancy rate for independent living (IL) communities surpassed 90% in the third quarter, increasing 0.5 percentage points to 90.2%.
  • For assisted living (AL) communities, the occupancy rate jumped nearly a full percentage point to 87.2%.
  • These strong trends in both property types illustrate the choice-driven demand from the younger or healthier older adults moving into IL, as well as the need-driven demand from those seeking AL services and care.

Takeaway #2: Active Adult Nearly 96% Occupied Upon Stabilization

  • The active adult occupancy rate stood at 92.1% in the third quarter, edging down 0.2 percentage points from the prior quarter, but still well above 90% occupied.
  • The active adult occupancy rate includes all properties, including those still in lease-up. As a result, the dip may be driven from new units arriving online that are still being absorbed.
  • Overall, occupancy rates have ranged from 92% to 94% over the past six quarters since NIC MAP began tracking this data.
  • For active adult communities open at least two years, occupancy rates are near 96%.

Takeaway #3: Inventory Growth Setting New Record Lows

  • The cost of capital, materials, and labor, among other headwinds, continue to limit inventory growth.
  • Fewer than 1,400 new units were opened in the third quarter, and inventory growth remained well below 1% for the second consecutive quarter, with only 0.7% inventory growth from a year earlier.
  • This muted new supply is setting new record lows since NIC MAP began tracking this data in 2007.

Takeaway #4: Construction Levels Lowest Since 2012

  • For both IL and AL properties, the number of units under construction continued to decline, falling to only 17,000 units combined in the third quarter, levels last seen in early 2012.

Takeaway #5: Negative Inventory Growth in 26% of Primary Markets

  • Eight of the 31 Primary Markets have less senior housing units today in their markets than they did three years ago.
  • This decline in senior housing inventory is due to property closures, or to units being converted to other uses, without enough new communities or new units being opened to replace them.
  • San Antonio has nearly 4% less inventory today compared to three years ago, followed by Pittsburgh at nearly 3% less; Riverside at 2% less; and Tampa and San Diego at 1% less.
  • Houston, Baltimore, and Los Angeles round out the eight metro areas with shrinking senior housing inventory.